Home About Us Articles Your Word Images Gallery Videos Gallery Wikipeace Donate
Mission A Guide to Perplexed

Why did Arafat choose not to continue negotiating and turn to violence instead?

by Yitzhak Frankenthal  23.06.2013 Let us review what it is that the Palestinians actually got from Barak over two years: 

+   A closure was imposed on the Territories as a form of collective punishment; 

+   People who were involved in the peace process were not allowed to move freely; 

+   Public figures were humiliated at road blocks; 

+   Unemployment was rampant; 

+   Water supply was scarce, especially when compared to the unlimited supply at the

      setters’ disposal; 

+   Palestinian homes were destroyed while the settlers built more and more houses; 

+   and prisoners who were sentenced for things they had done before the signing of

      Oslo Accords were not released. 

Barak was forced to tiptoe between the coalition and the opposition and eventually did not give the Palestinians what they were supposed to receive. Under these circumstances, the Palestinians claimed, they had nothing left to lose. The Al Aqsa Intifada caught Arafat by surprise too, and he continued negotiating until the Taba Summit in January 2001, in which both sides offered to make concessions. At the end of this summit, both sides announced that they intended to keep the talks going in the aim of signing a peace agreement.

 

Comment
Your Comment Will be overviewed by a site Administrator to decide if to publish.
E-mail Name
Comment
i agree to the Terms And Conditions
For Security Reasons, Please type in the following field the letters you see in the image
CAPTCHA Image


If The Image Is Not Clear, Click to Try Another
1 Comments
1 by Steve
The Palestinians use violence not because they don't have anything to lose but because they use it as leverage against the Israelis. Give us and we'll stop, don't give us we'll continue. The threat of violence is always over the heads of those negotiating. That is not the way to move forward.